
Let’s count the number of times it has been brought to our (“our” meaning boomers and olders) attention that we are being shut out of popular advertising. Or let’s not. It’s a lot of times. That’s all you have to know. AARP Magazine has done it again, in an article titled “Who’s Afraid of A Touch of Gray?” Apparently, advertisers are. Hiss, boo. More words not written, because this is a family-friendly blog.
Here’s the jist: “There are 100 million of us (folks over 50). We will soon control over 70% of the disposable income of this country. We buy two-thirds of all new cars (people 75 and older buy five times as many new cars as those age 18-24), half of all computers, and a third of all movie theater tickets. We spend $7 billion a year online (Life in the Boomer Lane personally spends about $6 billion of that).” It goes on and on. In sum, we, alone, constitute what amounts to the third largest economy in the world, “trailing the gross national product of the US and China.”
If you are still sitting calmly in your computer chair, happily sipping your coffee with unsweetened rice milk and not calling/writing/emailing your Congressperson in a total rage, let LBL continue:
In spite of all the buying power held by over-50s, only 5% of all advertising is directed at older consumers. Advertising continues to be directed at the 18-49-year-old-demographic. AARP believes this is because of habit. This is the historic demographic, set in 10,000 BC when there was no 50+ population, and even the sages with long white beards who lived on the mountaintops were actually about 34-years-old. They just looked real bad.
LBL has a different spin. LBL believes this is also because younger consumers (the younger part of that 18-49 demographic) are more swayed by popular media, while older folks aren’t. Younger people, especially younger, younger people, are on an endless quest to hunt down the product-du-jour. They are also swayed more easily by advertising featuring celebrities.
The sad fact (even though this isn’t fact at all, only LBL’s considered opinion and she is a true nobody in the world of advertising or of rational thought of any kind) is that advertisers believe they can depend on us to continue to buy what we buy, without being courted. We will spend our dollars on solid-performing cars and Harleys, reliably travel the world or to see the grandchildren, buy tons online because it’s easier than driving to the mall in traffic, hunting for parking spaces, and then being rewarded by having to make our way through large unruly clumps of people our grandchildren’s age.
We will upgrade our computers, our cell phones, and our tablets because we are hoping that the next version is a bit more light-weight and a bit more user-friendly than the last version. We will buy clothing and music and movie tickets, more out of a sense of knowing what we like than of knowing what others like. We will buy skin care, hair care, and cosmetics because we believe they work (or because we know they don’t but we are compelled to pretend they do), rather than because a young starlet is advertising the products.
In other words, we are predictable and we are dependable. In the world of advertising, we are either a big yawn or a big question mark.
AAARP suggests that those over-50s who want to make a change in the system, start to patronize the few companies whose ads speak to us. That’s a good idea. She would go one better. She would suggest taking a short break from Words With Friends to send off a few emails of words to companies who insult us with their blatant disregard of our buying power. LBL would personally start with companies touting anti-aging products modeled by actresses in their 20s. (LBL does not buy any under-eye concealer represented by a spokesperson who earned her dark circles via partying the night before and not via decades of life on the planet.)
Will advertising ever change? LBL doesn’t know. She writes this stuff; she doesn’t predict it. She does know that, ideally, she would love to see older people advertising all products, not just those products geared for older people (hell, even baby products are purchased by grandparents.) She also believes that hot cars, cute shoes, and state-of-the-art computer technology should include older spokespersons as well. As AARP states, “the population of 50-plus consumers is projected to grow by 34 percent between now and 2030.”
We folks over age 50 are The Giant Consumer that Ate the World. We deserve to be spoken to.
Roy Sexton (Reel Roy Reviews)
July 8, 2014
Sadly, this is true of advertising and television in the media in general. And it is a bit of a legacy created by the baby boomers themselves. Imagine how our parents and grandparents felt when all the advertising focused only on us for decades. I agree, beyond the social injustice, it’s a missed opportunity for advertisers. Give us a product we will want to buy and a message that speaks to us, and we will follow suit.
>
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 11, 2014
Agreed. There are products I avoid buying, simply because the advertising offends me. Bt you have a good point, there. We boomers did take over the media at one point, didn’t we?
Roy Sexton (Reel Roy Reviews)
July 11, 2014
Pretty much!
wordsfromanneli
July 8, 2014
There are a few ads that target boomers and beyond, but I’m disgusted with them as they all make us look like idiots. They talk down to our age group, as if we’re already in the home, or should be.
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 11, 2014
Yes, yes, yes. I’ve seen some ads that don’t, but most of the time I cringe.
btg5885
July 8, 2014
I have another take on this. I don’t mind at all not being advertised to. It gives me one less ad to ignore. Do an informal poll – what ads are on TV the most, especially around the time of the news – cars, car insurance, purple pills (and the like), some form of ED drug, some form of vaginal drying drug (these last two make it interesting when the kids walk through) and the political ads (which are now continual). Unless, the commercial has some humor in it, I tend to mute the ads. I mute all political ads, period, as most are embellished at best and this is my way to stand up to Citizens United and tell rich funders they are wasting their money.
K.L.Richardson
July 8, 2014
I agree with btg, I hate listening to the commercials. From my standpoint it is more because all they do is remind me I am getting older. And some of the products I don’t need, want or even want to HEAR about….some things are a natural progression to life. Sorry guys but if you are 85 and still want viagra you are just creepy…same goes for the female version of that. And if I hear about one more catheter that doesn’t scrape or cut I’ll go out of my flippin’ mind!
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 11, 2014
Those are all the WORST.
katecrimmins
July 8, 2014
A look at the bright side of change — with commercials targeted to us boomers, there would be more jobs for aging actors/actresses touting products. It’s hard for me to get excited when a 30-something talks about anti-aging creams. However, if Jane Fonda or one of her fabulous looking 70-year-old peers does, I’m all ears. You don’t think they would photoshop the pictures, would they? Naw! The advertisers wouldn’t be that sleezy…or would they?
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 11, 2014
I just read that now selfies are being photoshopped. It’s the end of the world.
katecrimmins
July 11, 2014
I need to do that! No matter what I do my selfies always are out of proportion. It’s either that or my nose is a foot longer than any other appendage!
Nataly Rubinstein
July 8, 2014
I love BTG! Over 50 does have the power- love the fact that the advertisers target the misinformed youth (which we once were). With age comes wisdom….we are smart enough to know that there are no magical cures or elixirs that is going to cure or reverse. Advertisers have an agenda- we are way to savvy.
BABYBOOMER johanna van zanten
July 8, 2014
Actually, let it be. I am happy not to be targets, as I skip the commercials, only really watch PVR- taped shows and fast forward through ads, do not read glossy magazines, read paper digitally and do not have to look at the commercials there either, so wasted on me!
Johanna
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 12, 2014
We watch TV on Netflix, which is a commercial-free joy. But even if I’m not watching, I’m still aware that our demographic is either underrepresented or represented in a very narrow way.
chlost
July 8, 2014
This really hit home with me when I was shopping (online,of course!) for a mother of the bride dress. All of the models for the dresses were in their mid twenties.
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 12, 2014
Great example. There are so many older models nowadays. Why are they using age inappropriate ones?
Susan in TX
July 9, 2014
As a Boomer, the irony of our mantra does strike me occasionally . . . don’t trust anyone over 30. Even our “kids” are over 30 now!
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 12, 2014
As are mine. But I’ve always said I don’t trust them.
Chuck
July 9, 2014
All pretty much true. To dig deeper into the whys, breeze through the intro and chapter of my book Advertising to Baby Boomers (c)2005, 2007. You can download them here:
Click to access AdvertisingToBabyBoomersIntroChapterOne.pdf
Or visit my blog: http://www.advertisingtobabyboomers.com
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 12, 2014
Interesting, Chuck. And funny blog, as well. Thanks for finding mine.
Valentine Logar
July 9, 2014
Why would you want advertising directed at you, that is the bigger question isn’t it. I don’t want it. Go ahead, please ignore me.
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 12, 2014
I believe that each age demographic contributes to a society and should be valued. When media ignores us, it makes it easier for society in general to do the same.
divorce1943
July 9, 2014
I don’t need advertising directed at me. I’m happy to ignore what is going on around me to a point. But I see your point. We still buy massive products. However, we are a seasoned group and they can’t put much by us – or can they? The younger ones are pretty naive and gullible. God help them.
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 12, 2014
And that is exactly one of the reason why advertisers spend more dollars targeting young consumers. So instead of then ignoring us, why not produce intelligent advertising that will actually have an impact on us?
Sunshinebright
July 9, 2014
I totally agree with the points you make; however, looking at it from the advertisers’ standpoint, in reality, how many older women (70 and +) do you think would buy makeup if it were modeled by an older woman with an overload of wrinkles, liver spots and droopy eyelids? I wouldn’t. Ha.
Life in the Boomer Lane
July 12, 2014
I would buy cosmetics and skincare if I saw actual older women whose skin was improved/enhanced by such products. There is a skin care line, M Asam, sold on HSN. A close friend of mine (age 72) models for them. I buy their products.
benzeknees
August 23, 2014
Since this over 50 is smart enough to own a PVR so I don’t have watch commercials anymore, quite frankly I don’t care about advertising anymore. I will buy what I want to buy, I get interested in new products more from the computer than any magazine or TV commercial. My hubby loves to do research on new products so we learn about things on our own.
Having said that, I do like the Dove beauty bar adverts because they feature real women of different ages & different sizes – real women!