A lot of Life in the Boomer Lane’s friends have declared a break from all things political: The constant stream of 24/7 news in their homes has been silenced. Political conversation has stopped. All reference to our newly-elected Nero-in-Chief has ceased. Anger and depression reign, taking up residence with that part of their souls that already houses genocide, poverty, gun culture, and unfair parking tickets. It’s completely understandable. It may not be productive, but it’s understandable. LBL is aware that sometimes, we must vacate the house of our higher selves in order to take up temporary residence in the damp, sort-of-creepy basement.
To those who can relate, LBL would suggest that perhaps it’s time to take a closer look at the news and the conversations and the thoughts that are being abandoned. Is that even possible? LBL has taken a hard look at her own stream of information sources, and she has decided to make some changes.
Back in 2016, and lasting until 2020, LBL meticulously followed every breath that POTUS took. Like airplane passengers who must stay awake during the flight (If they don’t, the pilot will crash the plane), LBL believed that only if she tracked the minute-by-minute spewings of our Person-in-Chief, would she save democracy from certain demise. As soon as Biden was elected, she no longer watched (Insert initials of your choice)24/7 news. She trusted Biden to make mistakes, but not to end the world as we knew it.
She is also newly aware that her enemy is neither the newly-elected president, nor the opposition politcal party nor the giant dark cloud that seems to be hanging over our heads. It’s disinformation. Disinformation goes deeper than politics. It forms our opinions of the vaccines we give our children and ourselves, our trust of science and of the media. LBL has started to look at organizations like News Literacy Project, Neweum ED, Center for Media Literacy, and FactCheck.org, that exist to teach people how to think about issues (as opposed to what to think about issues), as well as to provide evidence that many reported events that have spread like wildfire on the internet, may not be valid.
She still consults her Apple newsfeed, as well as the outstanding daily newsletter put out by Heather Cox Richardson. She subscribes to the New York Times daily newsfeed. She has now added Tangle, an outstanding overview of news topics with no specific agenda, other than to keep people informed. The goal is to get smart on all sides, left right and center.
She has also started to read other sources, ones that deep dive into specific topics. Instead of panels of experts who discuss the attention-grabbing news of the moment and then work it to death on TV, she consults those who discuss actual events and share heir deep thoughts. Her new go-to news sources now include Substack, an online platform which includes political writers across a wide base. Contributors include Robert Hubbell (teaching people to “think better’), Robert Reich (former Secy of Labor), Steven Bechloss (journalist, filmmaker), and Aaron Rupar (indie journalist of US politiocs and media). She always gets value out of these contributors.
As humans, we tend to create our own reality, based on personal experience, hearsay, and natural inclination. Then, having created a reality, we act as though it were true. We often miss the fact that most of our “How-could-I-do-otherwise?” behavior is actually a choice, and that there are a variety of choices we can select when life hands us what appears to be, at first glance, a steaming pile of dog poop. It never occurs to us that our reactions are often outcomes of what others tell us we should be feeling or believing. Like Sargeant Friday of “Dragnet“ vintage TV fame, while talking to a witness who is giving way too much extraneous information, LBL is at the point where she is directing Mother Earth (to simply provide) “Just the facts, Ma’m.” She will then form her own opinion. Analysis absolutely has its place, but not at the expence of facts.
Loyal Readers may be concerned that their entire day will now be spent reading news and political essays. LBL assures you that her own day allows for only for 10-15 minutes of this stuff, five if she has an early apointment. Especially provacative reading may demand a deeper dive in the evening. She’s a fast reader, for sure, but she is challenged in the attention span department. Anything over 15 or 20 minutes generally drops off a cliff. That’s enough to get her day started and leave lots of room for everything else, including whether she should screen in her entire wraparound porch.
All comments are welcome, especially the porch thing.


Kate Crimmins
November 12, 2024
Screen in the entire porch. We loved it at our last house. Unfortunately we have a deck that hangs off of the second story now so we get bugs and stuff. I’m in a news break now for my own sanity.
Life in the Boomer Lane
November 12, 2024
Many thanks, Kate, for slogging through the post to get to the real question about the screen porch. Several years ago, I screened the side of the wraparound porch and that has been the best thing I’ve ever done. It saved our lives during Covid, and we still ase it as much as possible. But now that climate change will no longer exist, and the warm season will happily go on and on and on, I’m inclined to extend the screening to partway across the front.
Kate Crimmins
November 12, 2024
After we were living at the old house 5 years, we made the porch 5′ longer. Sounds small but it was the best money spent. We needed the extra space to add a table and chairs and still have a sofa and loveseat. We lived and did most of our entertaining there.
Anonymous
November 12, 2024
Excellent advice. Leaving the echo chamber is difficult. We’re attempting to go newsfree, but staying in the dark is also uncomfortable.
Life in the Boomer Lane
November 12, 2024
Many thanks for reading and commenting. You are in vast company. I still keep up with the news, but I lessen the commentary. I also no longer track every minute of T’s life, a huge relief. I’m sure he appreciates that, as well.
Andrew Reynolds
November 12, 2024
Yes, screen in the porch. I stopped listening to mainstream news years ago. I check local stuff daily, but rarely read deeply on anything. The only national/world news source I check is BBC, but am very selective about what I read from them. Where possible I try to go directly to the source of information and not some journalists interpretation. Sadly the lies are just too many and constant. I try to apply critical thinking to everything I’m told. Presidents and congress are always bad, but rarely do they really affect my daily life. We need to be careful with our panic buttons — our “enemies” know how to push those and get us to act the way they want us to.
Life in the Boomer Lane
November 13, 2024
Thanks, Andrew. You bring up an outstanding point. So much of what we read/see/hear provides no source. I’ve started to ask people where they got the information they are giving. Sadly, they often can’t give an answer.
geezenslaw
November 12, 2024
Hi LBL, I understand your new turn toward some of the new political media outlets you mentioned in your 4th paragraph…
I actually may take a peek or two at the content…
At the same time I’m still reviewing as you do Richarson and Reich IMHO GOATs on the all important topics of the day…
Notwithstanding urging or persuading the Orangina electorate to do so likewise to me is a very laughable endeavour…
The Orangina electorate is horribly ignorant and devoid of any sense of thinking for themselves exactly what both the Orangina and the electorate want…
Ex-pat exit strategy still in progress as soon as the knee surgery heals…
Excellent article as always…
Fair Winds…
Life in the Boomer Lane
November 13, 2024
Thanks. With mainstream news bombarding us around the clock, we forget that there are other legitimate news sources out there. And there are also easy ways to check what we hear. Critical thinking should be taught in schools, but, alas, that wouldn’t happen.
billneet
November 13, 2024
Long term reader but probably first comment. I am a proud member of your generation. For many years (after the kids left) we have been without television which we do not miss at all. Mostly read and stream a few things. So, no network news or other nonsense and I am practically anti-sports so don’t miss it.
I feel adequately informed, but I am very selective about my news feeds.
I read something recently that going is to be a “go to” method of dealing with information from now on. In “print” or in person.
We live in a very hypertexted world. Which simply means that you can write a very short article/opinion piece and easily use hypertext links to provide a massive amount of information to back up your conclusions.
A recent MSM opinion article of 110 words had 27 hyperlinks to back up their opinions. 110 words quickly becomes thousands of words which creates a very informed opinion that can verified or validated.
So, when I read or hear something that smells or seems the least bit suspect and has no hyperlinks to data I will be calling “bulls___”. If someone in a conversation says (spouts) something that sounds sort of WTF? I will be asking “where do you get this?”
And if they can’t provide some sort of reasonable reply, I am politely going say something like “I’m sorry but without some sort of reference to the source of this information/opinion came from I am inclined to disagree with you (or question your conclusion or whatever best fits in the conversation).”
I will hold myself to the same standards when I make comments, etc.
I am just going to call out BS when I can.
Life in the Boomer Lane
November 13, 2024
Thanks for your excellent comments, Bill. There is a wealth of information out there that exists for the purpose of educating us. Much of that demands a few minutes of out time to check sources or to dig deeper. But we gravitate to what spoon feeds us, an easy mix of fact, sort of fact, and pure opinion. Even more than that, certain unnamed news sources provide, in addition, pure outrage on a never-ending basis. So not only are we told how to feel, we are provided the appropriate level of anger to go with it.
I can’t tell you how many times I was told that Hillary was the Devil and later, that Kamala was the Devil. When I asked why, exactly, the answer was usually something like “I just don’t trust her.”
Would that we were all required to display hyperlinks on our foreheads, when we present political opinion.
Anonymous
November 13, 2024
It’s Dr. Heather Cox Richardson. I follow her, too….religiously.
Life in the Boomer Lane
November 14, 2024
Many thanks for the correction. Another reader caught it as well, and I corrected. I’m a great fan of the author, journalist and social commentator, Isabel Wilkerson, and I have transposed the two names before. Two powerful thinkers, indeed.